This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The journal continued to be in good hands, and thus one of the few journals that was receptive to research findings that belied the narrative of therapeutic progress that the psychiatric guild and pharmaceutical companies have been promoting for decades. He noted too the reluctance of the field to consider this possibility.
Depression was sold to us as a simple problem of serotonin insufficiency, a convenient narrative that made drug companies like Eli Lilly, Forest Pharmaceuticals, and Pfizer very rich. As a former pharmaceutical advertising writer, I not only witnessed the explosive growth in antidepressant drugs, I contributed to it.
I fear that the American populace has been coercedby pervasive pharmaceutical marketing and academic psychiatrys obfuscations into believing a compelling but dubious tale about the nature of antidepressants.
Third, his journal told of the corrupting influence of pharmaceutical money on the creation of psychiatric diagnoses and drug trials. Whitaker: There are those two funding sources, open access where people have to pay, or journals where they’re basically funded by pharmaceutical advertisements.
Although there was already a very strong biological current in psychiatry, at that time there was still the strong influence of psychotherapy, psychoanalysis, and social psychiatry. The pharmaceutical industry wanted to put a line between benzodiazepines and their new range of drugs. They marketed this new range of drugs as SSRIs.
I got into this headspace where I was like, I will not give the pharmaceutical industry one more dollar after what they did to me. And then I find myself sitting there, shocked at how deeply this experience shaped me—how much it continues to influence my life in ways I still can’t put into words. It kept me alive.
In hindsight, this bait-and-switch is understandable, given the Scientific Revolutions influences on psychiatry in its oxymoronic striving to be a specialty that objectively targeted subjective mental suffering. While admittedly not mind in themselves, these proxies were presented for all intents and purposes as if they were.
But only few understand that these statements do not prove a strong genetic influence. Interim conclusion: The GWAS that are so often praised today do not confirm any major influence of genes, in particular no cause-and-effect relationship, and are dependent on the inclusion of other factors.
Another key influence on my thinking was Jack Martin. And could you say a bit about which authors or theorists have influenced your thinking on this topic? Taylors book traces these transformations in selfhood in a way that is both rigorous and breathtaking in scope. Reading it was a profoundly humbling and eye-opening experience.
What were the influences on you personally, but also nationally and culturally, that led you to take this path that’s going to eventually form Open Dialogue in the 1990s? Whitaker: Can you speak about another influence in terms of developing dialogic approaches, Tom Anderson from Norway?
House Bill 25-1063 , approved in April 2025, represents one such effort, revealing the intersection of commercial interests, intellectual property concerns, and the pharmaceutical model’s influence on psychedelic policy.
So, even if they were not fans of Hitler, they grew up in this time and, as I felt, they were not very reflective about the influence of that terrible Zeitgeist on the development of their personalities. Together we wrote an informational brochure about neuroleptics free from the commercial interests of the pharmaceutical industry.
Fee: My gut feeling is Big Pharma and its influence over the entire medical profession. I dont know this for a fact, but Id bet a lot of money goes into The New York Times from pharmaceutical advertising. Its too big of an influence. So just since Richard died, the numbers have skyrocketed. Doctors arent in charge anymore.
I had no clue how much these drugs were influencing everything I believed and felt, beyond just keeping me not depressed — which they never really did. I made the decision that I would rather feel withdrawal for the rest of my life than give one more cent to the pharmaceutical industry on this topic.
I was just a copywriter working in pharmaceutical advertising. The rise of atypical antipsychotics was a business and marketing phenomenon—driven in part by a wave of pharmaceutical mergers in the 1990s. I didn’t set out to shape the field of psychiatry. The agency was in Midtown Manhattan. The client was Johnson & Johnson.
But this framework ignores that what we codify as psychopathology may be a rather normative and sane response to adversity, and that the factors influencing those responses are systemically/externally (rather than individually/internally) caused. economic exploitation or other forms of injustice).
1 The Cochrane authors had not listed any conflicts in relation to drug firms, but they did not tell their readers that the studies they included, 37 placebo-controlled trials (12,226 participants), were heavily influenced by drug firms. Selective publication of antidepressant trials and its influence on apparent efficacy.
The design is influenced by the natural surroundings on which the 56,000 square foot building sits in Marina Del Rey. Design : Worksmart Design Design Team : Mandy Adams, Fiona Chan Photography : RJ Guillermo The post Armata Pharmaceuticals Offices – Marina Del Rey appeared first on Office Snapshots.
” The study also sheds light on the factors influencing patients’ decisions to continue, switch, or discontinue antidepressant treatment. Stephenson and a team of researchers from various academic and pharmaceutical institutions, including the University of Virginia School of Medicine. The study was authored by Judith J.
In the sense that everything is influenced by politics in one way or another yes, therapy is political. His entire social existence was so saturated with these power dynamics and vested interests that its possible he was blind to the influence they had on his perspective. Is therapy political? Mental health is also political.
They looked at the largest, most influential clinical trials of antidepressants and found that almost half were so biased that they could be considered “seeding trials”—or studies that provide marketing materials for the pharmaceutical industry, not valid scientific data. Large trials are rare in the field of antidepressant research.
Or maybe you’d like to expand your influence with a broader audience. Venture capital funds are seeing increased success in pharmaceutical, health care and technology company startup labs across the country, as they partner with various providers to share liabilities and costs while creating more value in the mutually supported businesses.
Turner has used FDA data to illuminate the influence of publication bias and lack of efficacy of other drugs as well, including antidepressants and esketamine. Unpublished trials of alprazolam XR and their influence on its apparent efficacy for panic disorder. It was published in Psychological Medicine. Y., & Turner, E.
For Part 2, we will be covering reader questions on pharmaceutical marketing and issues with psychiatric treatments including psychiatric drugs and electroconvulsive therapy. It’s continuing this idea that there’s something wrong in you that needs an external influence to correct, isn’t it? How about the kids?
She is co-author, with Robert Whitaker, of Psychiatry under the Influence: Institutional Corruption, Social Injury, and Prescriptions for Reform. When medical historians say, “This particular person got an appreciable amount of money from a pharmaceutical company, in this case, Merck and Parke-Davis,” we want to know how much money it is.
Through the 1990s, I was dismayed that the influence of pharmaceutical marketing had seemed to suppress that idea, as polypharmacy and use of higher doses of drugs became part of accepted practice. This might be due to the work Moncrieff and others have already done in influencing practice in the UK.
The Ignition Schools list honors the top academic institutions that play an enormous role in shaping the businesses that influence society. Welcome to the first-ever edition of Ignition Schools, a collaboration between Fast Company and our sibling publication, Inc. respectively—are also the focus of Ignition Schools.
This connection between mental health and the use of battlefield and warfare metaphors has meaningful implications for how people perceive and cope with mental health conditions, influencing how care goals are set and treatment plans are designed. In this ‘garden’ model, mental health is seen as a collective, dynamic cultivation process.
Bill Berman & George Bradt (Influence and Impact, p. What Influence and Impact by Bill Berman and George Bradt Is About. people lose their ability to influence others and impact the organization because they are not focused on the most essential, mission-critical business and cultural priorities. What is influence?
Relying solely on a narrow set of approaches can limit the breadth and depth of your influence and hinder the full potential of your organization. In Tony’s work as a leadership coach, he worked with a pharmaceutical CEO who realized that her company’s long-term vision had become blurred.
Pharmaceutical companies, exerting their influence on academic psychiatry through lucrative honoraria and advisory board payments, have clearly played a role in how antidepressant risks have been presented. This notable gap has raised some suspicion that the necessary research has not merely been overlooked but deliberately avoided.
Clearly, this influences whether they are regarded as ‘ill’ or as distressed, whether they might be considered dangerous, incapable, threatening and so on. There are many voices articulating the need for politicians and others with influence to act against growing levels of material inequality, but these tend to fall on deaf ears.
I worked with one global pharmaceutical client that was struggling to adapt to rapid growth as the demand for a blockbuster drug skyrocketed. These unspoken yet powerful influencers shape our expectations of others, drive important decisions , and dictate whether or not we are truly available to listen to differing points of view.
Capitalist society is not based on happiness but on productivity, and psychiatry is part of this system, not least because of the pharmaceutical companies’ great influence over research. You could call it corruption if you were of the zealous sort.
Two segments, energy and manufacturing, account for much of the rising demand as companies scramble to build everything from liquefied-natural-gas facilities and pharmaceutical plants to data centers and chip fabs. Exercise real decision influence.
Prior to the days of pharmaceutical companies, there was no such thing as “depression”. He believed that people’s strange behaviours were not mental illnesses. They represented “problems in living”. Unfortunately, not many “experts” and other psychiatrists took him seriously.
But there are a lot of factors I think that influenced that. Moore: And of course, it was an open door then for the pharmaceutical industry, wasn’t it, with their massive marketing dollars. And I think she’s right that medical psychiatry and the pharmaceutical companies needed a vision like that.
Schatzberg has served as a consultant to or received honoraria from Abbott, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Corcept Therapeutics, Forest Laboratories, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Merck, Mitsubishi Pharmaceuticals, Organon, ParkeDavis, Pfizer, Pharmacia–Upjohn, Sanofi, Scirex, SmithKline Beecham, Solvay, and Wyeth–Ayerst. 10:20 He calls this “scientism”.
Mark had the grit and determination to submit our paper to a very high-ranking, high-influence journal. But I do think there needs to be a balance between the massive amount of promotion that there is funded by pharmaceutical companies to start these medications, and what limited information there is on how to stop the medication.
I believe all of the existing health entities—providers, health insurance companies, the FDA, the pharmaceutical industry, and managed care—cannot and will not make needed changes to improve the quality of healthcare and to lower the cost as well. How do we get more science rather than propaganda to shape current healthcare delivery?
I once worked at an organization, and my department worked on connecting pharmaceutical companies with government officials. personal life issues that influence their level of commitment. Here’s the holy trinity of company management mistakes that force employees to leave. You Spread Them Thin. the experience that they can apply.
Critical factors such as lifestyle habits and environmental influences, known as Social Determinants of Health (SDOH) , often play a more substantial role. SDOH are nonmedical factors that influence health outcomes. What happens at work influences life; what happens in life shows up at work.
It was a healthcare-related nonprofit, and the articles indicated that the organization was funded and heavily influenced by corporate pharmaceutical companies despite portraying itself as an advocate for patients. I have done a Google search recently and have uncovered no more investigative articles along the same lines.
H ow can psychiatry maintain its authority and influence despite its repeated scientific failures and lack of progress—now even acknowledged by key members of the psychiatric establishment and the mainstream media? How can psychiatry retain its authority and influence despite its scientific failures? Evolutionary geneticist R.C.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content